Here's a letter that I submitted to the New York TImes a few weeks back. It was not accepted. Please use the text where you feel appropriate.
December 12, 2014
To the Editors of the New York Times
Dear Editors, in 9 months, world leaders
will descend on New York during the UN General Assembly and proudly proclaim
the beginning of the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) era.
As the
just released first-ever Global
Nutrition Report notes, malnutrition is a serious health issue for every
country on the planet. Despite this, malnutrition is in danger of missing the
SDG boat. Out of 169 SDG targets, nutrition is mentioned only once. This, despite being responsible in one way or
another for 45% of child deaths under 5 and global GNP losses of 8%. And we know what to do to turn the tide and
what we will get in return. Investments in scaling up nutrition programmes will
yield economic returns that beat the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial
over the past 80 years.
Something is terribly
wrong with this picture. We urge all
those who care about seeing shrunken and wizened children, baby coffins,
morbidly obese individuals, and women rendered lifeless by anemia, to change
the picture. Write to your congressman or woman, sign petitions, direct short
videos, begin Twitter campaigns, talk to your spiritual leaders, call up your
radio stations, tell your parents, children and friends: malnutrition affects
all countries.
Fortunately all countries can affect malnutrition through a
series of interventions which are proven to be effective in reducing it--but they
must hold themselves accountable for their efforts. That is achieved, in part,
by getting more nutrition targets into the post 2015 development goals. After all, what is measured stands a chance
of getting done.
Lawrence Haddad, Co-Chair of the Independent
Expert Group of the Global Nutrition Report and Senior Research Fellow,
International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC
2 comments:
Lawrence well written! Feel sorry for NY Times to be complacent. If only the children had a right to vote, this constituency of policy leaders could ill afford to ignore this precious resource. Raj Bhandari from Mumbai, India
Purse-strings before heart-strings. If nutrition is a development issue,the economic benefits in para 2 should be the focus of advocacy, with health as the mechanism rather than the focus.
Post a Comment