The Global Panel is co-chaired by John Kufuor, the former President of Ghana and World Food Prize laureate and by Sir John Beddington, former Chief Scientist to the UK Government and it is hosted well at the London International Development Centre. The independent report was support by UKAid and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The report basically says the following things:
1. Diet is by far the main risk factor for the global burden of disease
2. Diets are not getting better with income
3. The consequences of poor diet go well beyond poor health and undermine sustainable development4. The food system is a big part of the problem – and a big part of the solution
5. Policymakers have many options to move food systems from villain to hero, and the report attempts to expand this set of options
6. The wide set of options and the incomplete data and evidence base make the selection of the right set of policies a real challenge
7. New data, new tools and new ideas (all provided by the report) are needed to help policymakers develop a set of food system policy responses that are right for their diet problems
8. Policymakers need to make more compelling arguments for why this issue is so important—so they can bring other stakeholders into the picture, and the report aims to help here.
Perhaps the biggest message from the report to policymakers is: wake up!
Diets are the main cause of illness, they are not going to get better any time soon, and the consequences of inaction are staggering.
Members of the audience corralled me after the talk. Perhaps the most glaring omission in the report is the treatment of consumers as shapers of food systems. It is true that we don’t spend much time in the report on nutrition education and behaviour change of consumers. This is definitely an important area and one where we need more answers. But we decided to focus more on the behavior change of policymakers in the public sphere and decision makers in the private sector. They too need to change their behavior if food environments are to make it easier for people to make healthy choices. Consumers base their purchases on culture, income, prices, food quality, taste, nutrition and desirability, but if they are priced out of healthy foods there is not too much they can do about it individually or even, perhaps, through consumer collective action.
Anna Lartey the Director of Nutrition at FAO said we have all missed an opportunity to get a diet quality indicator and goal into the SDGs, but let’s try to get them into national goals. I agree. If we don’t know whether food systems are diet quality friendly and if we don’t know what diets look like, then we cannot hold public and private decision makers accountable -- and that hampers change.
These days it seems like everyone is writing reports on food systems and diet. The Committee on World Food Security’s High Level Panel of Experts has empowered a team (which I am a member of and which is led by Jessica Fanzo) to guide CFS members in this policy area. The challenge for this report will now be to add value to the Global Panel one. Unfortunately this will be easy. Why unfortunately? Because the problem is so wide ranging there are areas that the Global Panel did not highlight (such as consumer behavior change and collective action). In addition, this area is so dynamic that new challenges, opportunities, data and evidence can be factored into the HLPE report due out in mid-2017.
This diets and food systems problem is so big and so long in the making it is not likely to be fixed quickly, but let’s start to get serious about it now.